Pitfall in nephrology: contrast nephropathy has to be differentiated from renal damage due to atheroembolic disease.

Conclusions: In a setting regarding millions of patients and millions of dollars/year, in order to clarify the true renal damage directly related to CM, we ask for prospective studies differentiating cohorts receiving intravenous and intra-arterial, transradial and transfemoral injections, and clinically relevant renal outcomes, thus avoiding the dangers that can come from the idolatry of a surrogate end point such an asymptomatic 25% transient increase of serum creatinine. To avoid that, patients may lose the possibility of a more useful radiological diagnosis, because of an exaggerated suspicion of risk.
PMID: 22419233 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] (Source: Journal of Nephrology)