We published a meta-analysis which considered the strength of the current evidence for restricting dietary potassium in chronic kidney disease (CKD).1 We thank Visser et al.2 for their comments and for taking the time to pay such close attention to our results. We have reviewed our analysis in light of these and have found 2 errors. The labeling of the forest plots (Figs. 3 and 4) is incorrect, “Favors no restriction” should be “Favors restriction” and vice versa. In our meta-analysis, we inserted a negative figure, when it should have been positive in Noori et al.